↓ Skip to main content

System characterization report on the China-Brazil Earth Resources Satellite-4A (CBERS–4A)

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
System characterization report on the China-Brazil Earth Resources Satellite-4A (CBERS–4A)
Published in
US Geological Survey, August 2021
DOI 10.3133/ofr20211030j
Authors

Vrabel, James C., Stensaas, Gregory L., Anderson, Cody, Christopherson, Jon, Kim, Minsu, Park, Seonkyung, Cantrell, Simon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2021.
All research outputs
#12,928,513
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#1,065
of 2,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,089
of 430,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.