↓ Skip to main content

Anomalous Origin of the Left Coronary Artery From the Pulmonary Artery: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Anomalous Origin of the Left Coronary Artery From the Pulmonary Artery: A Retrospective Multicenter Study
Published in
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, August 2021
DOI 10.1097/pcc.0000000000002820
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine Cashen, David M. Kwiatkowski, Christine M. Riley, Jason Buckley, Peter Sassalos, Keshava N. Gowda, Ilias Iliopoulos, Adnan Bakar, Saurabh Chiwane, Aditya Badheka, Elizabeth A. S. Moser, Christopher W. Mastropietro, the Collaborative Research from the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Society Investigators

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Researcher 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 15 63%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Unknown 16 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,605,293
of 32,932,292 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
#1,177
of 4,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,461
of 454,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
#34
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,932,292 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,681 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.