↓ Skip to main content

Significance of the centrally expressed TRP channel painless in Drosophila courtship memory

Overview of attention for article published in Learning & Memory, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Significance of the centrally expressed TRP channel painless in Drosophila courtship memory
Published in
Learning & Memory, December 2012
DOI 10.1101/lm.029041.112
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Considerable evidence has demonstrated that transient receptor potential (TRP) channels play vital roles in sensory neurons, mediating responses to various environmental stimuli. In contrast, relatively little is known about how TRP channels exert their effects in the central nervous system to control complex behaviors. This is also true for the Drosophila TRP channel encoded by painless (pain). The Pain TRP channel is expressed in a subset of sensory neurons and involved in behavioral responses to thermal, chemical, and mechanical stimuli. Its physiological roles in brain neurons, however, remain largely elusive. Using multiple mutant alleles and tranformants for pain, here we demonstrate that the brain-expressed Pain TRP channel is required for long-term memory (LTM), but not for short-lasting memory, induced by courtship conditioning in adult males. The courtship LTM phenotype in pain mutants was rescued by expressing wild-type pain temporarily, prior to conditioning, in adult flies. In addition, targeted expression of painRNAi in either the mushroom bodies (MBs) or insulin-producing cells (IPCs) resulted in defective courtship LTM. These results indicate that the Pain TRP channels in the MBs and IPCs control neuronal plasticity that is required for the formation of a certain type of long-lasting associative memory in Drosophila.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 26%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 8 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 35%
Neuroscience 8 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Psychology 3 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 8 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2013.
All research outputs
#20,972,772
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Learning & Memory
#868
of 1,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,728
of 277,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Learning & Memory
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,004 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.