↓ Skip to main content

南海地震水没災害伝承の痕跡発掘に向けた沿岸域海底調査:須崎市野見湾を例に

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin on Coastal Oceanography, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
南海地震水没災害伝承の痕跡発掘に向けた沿岸域海底調査:須崎市野見湾を例に
Published in
Bulletin on Coastal Oceanography, September 2021
DOI 10.32142/engankaiyo.2021.4.001
Authors

谷川 亘, 村山 雅史, 井尻 暁, 廣瀬 丈洋, 浦本 豪一郎, 星野 辰彦, 田中 幸記, 山本 裕二, 濱田 洋平, 岡﨑 啓史, 徳山 英一

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2021.
All research outputs
#17,297,846
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin on Coastal Oceanography
#7
of 11 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,174
of 433,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin on Coastal Oceanography
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them