| Title |
Microstructured barbs on the North American porcupine quill enable easy tissue penetration and difficult removal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1216441109 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Woo Kyung Cho, James A. Ankrum, Dagang Guo, Shawn A. Chester, Seung Yun Yang, Anurag Kashyap, Georgina A. Campbell, Robert J. Wood, Ram K. Rijal, Rohit Karnik, Robert Langer, Jeffrey M. Karp |
| Abstract |
North American porcupines are well known for their specialized hairs, or quills that feature microscopic backward-facing deployable barbs that are used in self-defense. Herein we show that the natural quill's geometry enables easy penetration and high tissue adhesion where the barbs specifically contribute to adhesion and unexpectedly, dramatically reduce the force required to penetrate tissue. Reduced penetration force is achieved by topography that appears to create stress concentrations along regions of the quill where the cross sectional diameter grows rapidly, facilitating cutting of the tissue. Barbs located near the first geometrical transition zone exhibit the most substantial impact on minimizing the force required for penetration. Barbs at the tip of the quill independently exhibit the greatest impact on tissue adhesion force and the cooperation between barbs in the 0-2 mm and 2-4 mm regions appears critical to enhance tissue adhesion force. The dual functions of barbs were reproduced with replica molded synthetic polyurethane quills. These findings should serve as the basis for the development of bio-inspired devices such as tissue adhesives or needles, trocars, and vascular tunnelers where minimizing the penetration force is important to prevent collateral damage. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 20 | 28% |
| United States | 7 | 10% |
| China | 2 | 3% |
| Thailand | 1 | 1% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| Nepal | 1 | 1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 37 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 68 | 96% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Scientists | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 217 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 14% |
| Researcher | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 57 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 62 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 12% |
| Materials Science | 19 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 36 | 16% |
| Unknown | 65 | 29% |