↓ Skip to main content

“If I Die, They Do Not Care”: U.K. National Health Service Staff Experiences of Betrayal-Based Moral Injury During COVID-19

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological trauma: theory, research, practice, and policy, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
“If I Die, They Do Not Care”: U.K. National Health Service Staff Experiences of Betrayal-Based Moral Injury During COVID-19
Published in
Psychological trauma: theory, research, practice, and policy, March 2022
DOI 10.1037/tra0001134
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 135 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Lecturer 5 4%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 70 52%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 13 10%
Psychology 12 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 72 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2024.
All research outputs
#2,505,561
of 34,564,881 outputs
Outputs from Psychological trauma: theory, research, practice, and policy
#151
of 1,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,913
of 478,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological trauma: theory, research, practice, and policy
#5
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,564,881 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.