↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Inhibition of Inosine-5′-monophosphate Dehydrogenase from Bacillus anthracis: Mechanism Revealed by Pre-Steady-State Kinetics
Published in
Biochemistry, September 2016
DOI 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b00265
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Inosine-5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) catalyzes the conversion of inosine-5'-monophosphate (IMP) to xanthosine- 5'-monophosphate (XMP). The enzyme is an emerging target for antimicrobial therapy. The small molecule inhibitor A110 has been identified as potent and selective inhibitor of IMPDHs from a variety of pathogenic microorganisms. A recent X-ray crystallographic study reported that the inhibitor binds to the NAD+ cofactor site and forms a ternary complex with IMP. Here we report a pre-steady-state stopped-flow kinetic investigation of IMPDH from Bacillus anthracis designed to assess the kinetic significance of the crystallographic results. Stopped-flow kinetic experiments defined nine microscopic rate constants and two equilibrium constants that characterize both the catalytic cycle and details of the inhibition mechanism. In combination with steady-state initial rate studies, the results show that the inhibitor binds with high affinity (Kd ~ 50 nM) predominantly to the covalent intermediate on the reaction pathway. Only a weak binding interaction (Kd ~ 1 µM) is observed between the inhibitor and E.IMP. Thus the E.IMP.A110 ternary complex, observed by X-ray crystallography, is largely kinetically irrelevant.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Poland 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Researcher 4 20%
Professor 3 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 30%
Chemistry 5 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 8 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2016.
All research outputs
#13,994,558
of 24,397,600 outputs
Outputs from Biochemistry
#18,593
of 22,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,324
of 343,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemistry
#46
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,397,600 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,293 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.