↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Verification of monoplex and multiplex linear‐after‐the‐exponential PCR gene‐specific sepsis assays using clinical isolates

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Microbiology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Verification of monoplex and multiplex linear‐after‐the‐exponential PCR gene‐specific sepsis assays using clinical isolates
Published in
Journal of Applied Microbiology, January 2013
DOI 10.1111/jam.12062
Pubmed ID
23136961
Authors

N.L. Gentile, A.M. Dillier, G.V. Williams, J. Ackers, A.H. Reis, L.M. Rice, L.J. Wangh, J.W. Czajka, G.J. Kost

Abstract

To verify monoplex and multiplex gene-specific linear-after-the-exponential polymerase chain reaction (LATE-PCR) assays for identifying 17 microbial pathogens (i.e., Klebsiella sp., Acinetobacter baumannii, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterobacter sp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, coagulase negative staphylococci, Enterococcus sp., Candida sp.) commonly associated with septicaemia using clinical isolates.

View on publisher site

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 14%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 9 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 33%
Engineering 2 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2025.
All research outputs
#5,862,196
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Microbiology
#1,076
of 5,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,204
of 299,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Microbiology
#7
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.