↓ Skip to main content

Comparative Effectiveness of Moderna, Pfizer-BioNTech, and Janssen (Johnson

Overview of attention for article published in MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
375 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comparative Effectiveness of Moderna, Pfizer-BioNTech, and Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) Vaccines in Preventing COVID-19 Hospitalizations Among Adults Without Immunocompromising Conditions — United States, March–August 2021
Published in
MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, September 2021
DOI 10.15585/mmwr.mm7038e1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wesley H. Self, Mark W. Tenforde, Jillian P. Rhoads, Manjusha Gaglani, Adit A. Ginde, David J. Douin, Samantha M. Olson, H. Keipp Talbot, Jonathan D. Casey, Nicholas M. Mohr, Anne Zepeski, Tresa McNeal, Shekhar Ghamande, Kevin W. Gibbs, D. Clark Files, David N. Hager, Arber Shehu, Matthew E. Prekker, Heidi L. Erickson, Michelle N. Gong, Amira Mohamed, Daniel J. Henning, Jay S. Steingrub, Ithan D. Peltan, Samuel M. Brown, Emily T. Martin, Arnold S. Monto, Akram Khan, Catherine L. Hough, Laurence W. Busse, Caitlin C. ten Lohuis, Abhijit Duggal, Jennifer G. Wilson, Alexandra June Gordon, Nida Qadir, Steven Y. Chang, Christopher Mallow, Carolina Rivas, Hilary M. Babcock, Jennie H. Kwon, Matthew C. Exline, Natasha Halasa, James D. Chappell, Adam S. Lauring, Carlos G. Grijalva, Todd W. Rice, Ian D. Jones, William B. Stubblefield, Adrienne Baughman, Kelsey N. Womack, Christopher J. Lindsell, Kimberly W. Hart, Yuwei Zhu, Lisa Mills, Sandra N. Lester, Megan M. Stumpf, Eric A. Naioti, Miwako Kobayashi, Jennifer R. Verani, Natalie J. Thornburg, Manish M. Patel, IVY Network, IVY Network, Nicole Calhoun, Kempapura Murthy, Judy Herrick, Amanda McKillop, Eric Hoffman, Martha Zayed, Michael Smith, Natalie Seattle, Jason Ettlinger, Elisa Priest, Jennifer Thomas, Alejandro Arroliga, Madhava Beeram, Ryan Kindle, Lori-Ann Kozikowski, Lesley De Souza, Scott Ouellette, Sherell Thornton-Thompson, Omar Mehkri, Kiran Ashok, Susan Gole, Alexander King, Bryan Poynter, Nicholas Stanley, Audrey Hendrickson, Ellen Maruggi, Tyler Scharber, Jeffrey Jorgensen, Robert Bowers, Jennifer King, Valerie Aston, Brent Armbruster, Richard E. Rothman, Rahul Nair, Jen-Ting Chen, Sarah Karow, Emily Robart, Paulo Nunes Maldonado, Maryiam Khan, Preston So, Joe Levitt, Cynthia Perez, Anita Visweswaran, Jonasel Roque, Adreanne Rivera, Los Angeles, Trevor Frankel, Los Angeles, Jennifer Goff, David Huynh, Michelle Howell, Jennifer Friedel, Michael Tozier, Conner Driver, Michael Carricato, Alexandra Foster, Paul Nassar, Lori Stout, Zita Sibenaller, Alicia Walter, Jasmine Mares, Logan Olson, Bradley Clinansmith, Carolina Rivas, Hayley Gershengorn, EJ McSpadden, Rachel Truscon, Anne Kaniclides, Lara Thomas, Ramsay Bielak, Weronika Damek Valvano, Rebecca Fong, William J. Fitzsimmons, Christopher Blair, Andrew L. Valesano, Julie Gilbert, Christine D. Crider, Kyle A. Steinbock, Thomas C. Paulson, Layla A. Anderson, Christy Kampe, Jakea Johnson, Rendie McHenry, Marcia Blair, Douglas Conway, Mary LaRose, Leigha Landreth, Madeline Hicks, Lisa Parks, Jahnavi Bongu, David McDonald, Candice Cass, Sondra Seiler, David Park, Tiffany Hink, Meghan Wallace, Carey-Ann Burnham, Olivia G. Arter

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,200 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 375 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 375 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 10%
Researcher 37 10%
Student > Master 25 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 6%
Other 19 5%
Other 39 10%
Unknown 194 52%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 3%
Other 44 12%
Unknown 209 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4201. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2026.
All research outputs
#1,187
of 34,536,218 outputs
Outputs from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#57
of 5,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75
of 465,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#11
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,536,218 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 275.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 465,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.