You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
4.ツベルクリン反応
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nihon Naika Gakkai zasshi. The Journal of the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine, June 2008
|
DOI | 10.2169/naika.89.868 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
杉山 幸比古 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 137 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 35 | 26% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 98 | 72% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 132 | 96% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Scientists | 1 | <1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2021.
All research outputs
#493,896
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Naika Gakkai zasshi. The Journal of the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine
#1
of 748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#876
of 98,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Naika Gakkai zasshi. The Journal of the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine
#1
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 748 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.