↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacological Treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents: Clinical Strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Central Nervous System Disease, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
22 patents
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
7 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pharmacological Treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents: Clinical Strategies
Published in
Journal of Central Nervous System Disease, December 2012
DOI 10.4137/jcnsd.s6691
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neurobehavioral disorder of childhood that can result in significant functional impairment, and if not adequately treated can lead to impaired quality of life. Pharmacotherapy is considered the first-line treatment for ADHD in children and adolescents. We review both recent literature and seminal studies regarding the pharmacological treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents. There is ample evidence for the efficacy and safety of both stimulants and non-stimulants in the treatment of ADHD. We review important aspects of evaluation and assessment and discuss first-line pharmacological treatments and as well as when to consider using alternative pharmacological agents. Treatment approaches to manage frequently seen comorbid disorders with ADHD are also covered.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 195 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 33 17%
Student > Master 22 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Researcher 13 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 5%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 70 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 20%
Psychology 23 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Neuroscience 8 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 79 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2026.
All research outputs
#7,005,320
of 32,304,778 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Central Nervous System Disease
#52
of 163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,048
of 333,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Central Nervous System Disease
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,304,778 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them