↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pathogen-Specific Inflammatory Milieux Tune the Antigen Sensitivity of CD8+ T Cells by Enhancing T Cell Receptor Signaling
Published in
Immunity, December 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.09.017
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

CD8(+) T cells confer host protection through T-cell-receptor (TCR)-mediated recognition of foreign antigens presented by infected cells. Thus, generation of CD8(+) T cell populations with high antigen sensitivity is critical for efficient pathogen clearance. Besides selection of high-affinity TCRs, the molecular mechanisms regulating the antigen sensitivity of CD8(+) T cells remain poorly defined. Herein, we have demonstrated that the antigen sensitivity of effector and memory CD8(+) T cells is dynamically regulated and can be tuned by pathogen-induced inflammatory milieux independently of the selection of cells with higher TCR affinity. Mechanistically, we have demonstrated that the signal-transduction capacity of key TCR proximal molecules is enhanced by inflammatory cytokines, which reduced the antigen density required to trigger antimicrobial functions. Dynamic tuning of CD8(+) T cell antigen sensitivity by inflammatory cytokines most likely optimizes immunity to specific pathogens while minimizing the risk of immunopathology at steady state.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 153 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 28%
Researcher 35 22%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 6%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 26 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 38%
Immunology and Microbiology 41 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 6%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 26 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,933,509
of 31,301,153 outputs
Outputs from Immunity
#3,793
of 5,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,372
of 321,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunity
#27
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,301,153 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.