↓ Skip to main content

KDIGO 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Glomerular Diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Kidney International, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 10,130)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
2355 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
KDIGO 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Glomerular Diseases
Published in
Kidney International, October 2021
DOI 10.1016/j.kint.2021.05.021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Glomerular Diseases Work Group, Brad H. Rovin, Sharon G. Adler, Jonathan Barratt, Frank Bridoux, Kelly A. Burdge, Tak Mao Chan, H. Terence Cook, Fernando C. Fervenza, Keisha L. Gibson, Richard J. Glassock, David R.W. Jayne, Vivekanand Jha, Adrian Liew, Zhi-Hong Liu, Juan Manuel Mejía-Vilet, Carla M. Nester, Jai Radhakrishnan, Elizabeth M. Rave, Heather N. Reich, Pierre Ronco, Jan-Stephan F. Sanders, Sanjeev Sethi, Yusuke Suzuki, Sydney C.W. Tang, Vladimir Tesar, Marina Vivarelli, Jack F.M. Wetzels, Jürgen Floege

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 468 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 2355 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 226 10%
Other 134 6%
Student > Master 102 4%
Student > Postgraduate 87 4%
Researcher 83 4%
Other 290 12%
Unknown 1433 61%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 561 24%
Unspecified 74 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 65 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 56 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 2%
Other 110 5%
Unknown 1447 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 995. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2026.
All research outputs
#20,506
of 34,336,386 outputs
Outputs from Kidney International
#3
of 10,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#622
of 466,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kidney International
#1
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,336,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 466,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.