↓ Skip to main content

(書評)栗原茂幸著「「徳川光国の政治思想」(法学会雑誌(都立大)第一八巻第一=二合併号)」

Overview of attention for article published in Legal History Review, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
(書評)栗原茂幸著「「徳川光国の政治思想」(法学会雑誌(都立大)第一八巻第一=二合併号)」
Published in
Legal History Review, November 2009
DOI 10.5955/jalha.1979.196
Authors

尾藤 正英

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2021.
All research outputs
#15,839,422
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Legal History Review
#47
of 97 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,361
of 98,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Legal History Review
#14
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.