| Title |
Understanding the burden of interstitial lung disease post-COVID-19: the UK Interstitial Lung Disease-Long COVID Study (UKILD-Long COVID)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open Respiratory Research, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001049 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jim M Wild, Joanna C Porter, Philip L Molyneaux, Peter M George, Iain Stewart, Richard James Allen, Raminder Aul, John Kenneth Baillie, Shaney L Barratt, Paul Beirne, Stephen M Bianchi, John F Blaikley, Jonathan Brooke, Nazia Chaudhuri, Guilhem Collier, Emma K Denneny, Annemarie Docherty, Laura Fabbri, Michael A Gibbons, Fergus V Gleeson, Bibek Gooptu, Ian P Hall, Neil A Hanley, Melissa Heightman, Toby E Hillman, Simon R Johnson, Mark G Jones, Fasihul Khan, Rod Lawson, Puja Mehta, Jane A Mitchell, Manuela Platé, Krisnah Poinasamy, Jennifer K Quint, Pilar Rivera-Ortega, Malcolm Semple, A John Simpson, DJF Smith, Mark Spears, LIsa G Spencer, Stefan C Stanel, David R Thickett, A A Roger Thompson, Simon LF Walsh, Nicholas D Weatherley, Mark Everard Weeks, Dan G Wootton, Chris E Brightling, Rachel C Chambers, Ling-Pei Ho, Joseph Jacob, Karen Piper Hanley, Louise V Wain, R Gisli Jenkins |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 23% |
| United States | 5 | 10% |
| Spain | 4 | 8% |
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Ukraine | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 29% |
| Scientists | 9 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 53 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 55 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 173. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2023.
All research outputs
#240,493
of 25,958,626 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open Respiratory Research
#13
of 741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,326
of 438,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open Respiratory Research
#3
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,958,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.