You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic Review of the Application of Perinatal Derivatives in Animal Models on Cutaneous Wound Healing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2021.742858 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melanie Pichlsberger, Urška Dragin Jerman, Hristina Obradović, Larisa Tratnjek, Ana Sofia Macedo, Francisca Mendes, Pedro Fonte, Anja Hoegler, Monika Sundl, Julia Fuchs, Andreina Schoeberlein, Mateja Erdani Kreft, Slavko Mojsilović, Ingrid Lang-Olip |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 11% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2021.
All research outputs
#18,809,260
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#3,529
of 6,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#312,500
of 432,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#190
of 355 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,955 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 355 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.