↓ Skip to main content

An Example of Applying Wood Piles as a Countermeasure against Liquefaction during the 1964 Niigata Earthquake

Overview of attention for article published in Mokuzai Gakkaishi, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An Example of Applying Wood Piles as a Countermeasure against Liquefaction during the 1964 Niigata Earthquake
Published in
Mokuzai Gakkaishi, January 2009
DOI 10.2488/jwrs.55.305
Authors

Atsunori Numata, Masaho Yoshida, Masanori Hamada

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 50%
Lecturer 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 50%
Materials Science 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2021.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Mokuzai Gakkaishi
#22
of 36 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,096
of 183,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mokuzai Gakkaishi
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one scored the same or higher as 14 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.