↓ Skip to main content

Methodological issues in epidemiological studies of periodontitis - how can it be improved?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Oral Health, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Methodological issues in epidemiological studies of periodontitis - how can it be improved?
Published in
BMC Oral Health, April 2010
DOI 10.1186/1472-6831-10-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roos Leroy, Kenneth A Eaton, Amir Savage

Abstract

This position paper was commissioned by the European Association of Dental Public Health, which has established six working groups to investigate the current status of six topics related to oral public health. One of these areas is epidemiology of periodontal diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Uruguay 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 138 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Other 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 34 23%
Unknown 33 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 55%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 37 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2015.
All research outputs
#4,733,749
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Oral Health
#280
of 1,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,806
of 106,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Oral Health
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.