↓ Skip to main content

Kinome-wide Activity Modeling from Diverse Public High-Quality Data Sets

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Kinome-wide Activity Modeling from Diverse Public High-Quality Data Sets
Published in
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, January 2013
DOI 10.1021/ci300403k
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Large corpora of kinase small molecule inhibitor data are accessible to public sector research from thousands of journal article and patent publications. These data have been generated employing a wide variety of assay methodologies and experimental procedures by numerous laboratories. Here we ask the question how applicable these heterogeneous data sets are to predict kinase activities and which characteristics of the data sets contribute to their utility. We accessed almost 500,000 molecules from the Kinase Knowledge Base (KKB) and after rigorous aggregation and standardization generated over 180 distinct data sets covering all major groups of the human kinome. To assess the value of the data sets, we generated hundreds of classification and regression models. Their rigorous cross-validation and characterization demonstrated highly predictive classification and quantitative models for the majority of kinase targets if a minimum required number of active compounds or structure-activity data points were available. We then applied the best classifiers to compounds most recently profiled in the NIH Library of Integrated Network-based Cellular Signatures (LINCS) program and found good agreement of profiling results with predicted activities. Our results indicate that, although heterogeneous in nature, the publically accessible data sets are exceedingly valuable and well suited to develop highly accurate predictors for practical Kinome-wide virtual screening applications and to complement experimental kinase profiling.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 7%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Germany 2 2%
Brazil 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Unknown 73 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 19%
Other 8 9%
Student > Master 6 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 24 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 16%
Computer Science 11 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 14 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,083,888
of 27,265,997 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
#2,827
of 6,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,873
of 299,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
#19
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,265,997 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,270 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.