↓ Skip to main content

A common haplotype in the complement regulatory gene factor H (HF1/CFH) predisposes individuals to age-related macular degeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
patent
214 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
497 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A common haplotype in the complement regulatory gene factor H (HF1/CFH) predisposes individuals to age-related macular degeneration
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2005
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0501536102
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 497 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 481 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 89 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 15%
Student > Bachelor 59 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 7%
Student > Master 35 7%
Other 86 17%
Unknown 116 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 124 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 109 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 73 15%
Neuroscience 15 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 2%
Other 39 8%
Unknown 126 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2026.
All research outputs
#1,577,997
of 34,526,284 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#20,919
of 119,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,372
of 101,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#26
of 558 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,526,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 558 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.