↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Fat, Bone Marrow, Wharton’s Jelly, and Umbilical Cord Blood for Treating Spinal Cord Injuries in Dogs

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Fat, Bone Marrow, Wharton’s Jelly, and Umbilical Cord Blood for Treating Spinal Cord Injuries in Dogs
Published in
Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, August 2012
DOI 10.1292/jvms.12-0065
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hak-Hyun RYU, Byung-Jae KANG, Sung-Su PARK, Yongsun KIM, Gyu-Jin SUNG, Heung-Myong WOO, Wan Hee KIM, Oh-Kyeong KWEON

Abstract

Previous animal studies have shown that transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) into spinal cord lesions enhances axonal regeneration and promotes functional recovery. We isolated the MSCs derived from fat, bone marrow, Wharton's jelly and umbilical cord blood (UCB) positive for MSC markers and negative for hematopoietic cell markers. Their effects on the regeneration of injured canine spinal cords were compared. Spinal cord injury was induced by balloon catheter compression. Dogs with injured spinal cords were treated with only matrigel or matrigel mixed with each type of MSCs. Olby and modified Tarlov scores, immunohistochemistry, ELISA and Western blot analysis were used to evaluate the therapeutic effects. The different MSC groups showed significant improvements in locomotion at 8 weeks after transplantation (P<0.05). This recovery was accompanied by increased numbers of surviving neuron and neurofilament-positive fibers in the lesion site. Compared to the control, the lesion sizes were smaller, and fewer microglia and reactive astrocytes were found in the spinal cord epicenter of all MSC groups. Although there were no significant differences in functional recovery among the MSCs groups, UCB-derived MSCs (UCSCs) induced more nerve regeneration and anti-inflammation activity (P<0.05). Transplanted MSCs survived for 8 weeks and reduced IL-6 and COX-2 levels, which may have promoted neuronal regeneration in the spinal cord. Our data suggest that transplantation of MSCs promotes functional recovery after SCI. Furthermore, application of UCSCs led to more nerve regeneration, neuroprotection and less inflammation compared to other MSCs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 144 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 14%
Student > Master 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Other 11 7%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 41 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 28%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 17 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 12%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 43 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2012.
All research outputs
#16,721,208
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
#1,214
of 3,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,592
of 184,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,546 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.