↓ Skip to main content

Burkitt lymphoma risk in U.S. solid organ transplant recipients

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Hematology, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Burkitt lymphoma risk in U.S. solid organ transplant recipients
Published in
American Journal of Hematology, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/ajh.23385
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Case reports of Burkitt lymphoma (BL) in transplant recipients suggest that the risk is markedly elevated. Therefore, we investigated the incidence of BL in 203,557 solid organ recipients in the U.S. Transplant Cancer Match Study (1987-2009) and compared it with the general population using standardized incidence ratios. We also assessed associations with demographic and clinical characteristics, and treatments used to induce therapeutic immunosuppression. BL incidence was 10.8 per 100,000 person-years, representing 23-fold (95% confidence interval (CI) 19-28) greater risk than in the general population, and it peaked 3-8 years after the time of transplantation. In adjusted analyses, BL incidence was higher in recipients transplanted when <18 vs. ≥35 years (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 3.49, 95% CI 2.08-5.68) and in those transplanted with a liver (IRR 2.91, 95% CI 1.68-5.09) or heart (IRR 2.39, 95% CI 1.30-4.31) compared with kidney. BL incidence was lower in females than males (IRR 0.45, 95% CI 0.28-0.71), in blacks than whites (IRR 0.33, 95% CI 0.12-0.74), in those with a baseline Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-seropositive versus EBV-seronegative status (IRR 0.34, 95% CI 0.13-0.93), and in those treated with azathioprine (IRR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34-0.89) or corticosteroids (IRR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29-0.82). Tumors were EBV-positive in 69% of 32 cases with results. EBV positivity was 90% in those aged <18 years and 59% in those aged 18+ years. In conclusion, BL risk is markedly elevated in transplant recipients, and it is associated with certain demographic and clinical features. EBV was positive in most but not all BL cases with results.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 14 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 17 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2017.
All research outputs
#3,384,571
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Hematology
#697
of 5,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,440
of 342,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Hematology
#8
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,041 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.