↓ Skip to main content

Hyperemesis gravidarum in the primary care setting: cross-sectional study of GPs

Overview of attention for article published in BJGP Open, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Hyperemesis gravidarum in the primary care setting: cross-sectional study of GPs
Published in
BJGP Open, October 2021
DOI 10.3399/bjgpo.2021.0119
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melanie Nana, Holly Morgan, Haroon Ahmed, Catherine Williamson

Abstract

Hyperemesis gravidarum (HG), if untreated, can lead to malnutrition, dehydration and Wernicke's encephalopathy. Fetal complications include low birth weight and neurodevelopmental delay. Recent evidence supports increased rates of termination of pregnancy and suicidal ideation. Drivers included difficulty in accessing medications which thus contributed to poor perception of care. Identify factors that may influence prescribers' confidence and knowledge regarding pharmacological therapy for HG. Cross-sectional study of qualified GPs (General Practitioners) and GP trainees in Wales. Distribution of a 22-item online survey. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS. 241 responses were received with 216 included in the analysis (59% qualified GPs, 41% GP trainees). In total, 93% of respondents correctly identified cyclizine as being safe in pregnancy, but no other drug recommended in the Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology guidance was considered safe by more than 58%. Those reporting higher confidence levels in managing HG were more likely to correctly report guideline recommended drugs as safe in pregnancy (P=0.04). Additional qualifications related to obstetrics and gynaecology and/or prior clinical experience increased confidence levels (P=0.0001 and P=0.0002 respectively). Only 19% of participants routinely screened for signs of mental health complications and prior experience/education did not increase likelihood of this happening. 87% of participants would like additional education/access to evidence-based resources. This study demonstrates a demand for improved dissemination of evidence-based education to support those working in primary care. The extent to which HG is covered in pre-existing educational programmes should also be revisited.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 17 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Psychology 3 8%
Linguistics 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 16 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,085,732
of 25,489,496 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#131
of 640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,603
of 437,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,489,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.