You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
JAXA惑星物質試料受入設備における「はやぶさ」帰還試料の取り扱いと汚染管理
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Geochimica, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.14934/chikyukagaku.48.211 |
| Authors |
唐牛 譲, 石橋 之宏, 上椙 真之, 矢田 達, 中藤 亜衣子, 熊谷 和也, 岡田 達明, 安部 正真 |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2016.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Acta Geochimica
#27
of 141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,229
of 361,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Geochimica
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.