↓ Skip to main content

EVALUATION OF THERMAL DEGRADATION AND DYNAMIC FATIGUE OF RUBBER VULCANIZATES BY DYNAMIC VISCOELASTOMETRY

Overview of attention for article published in NIPPON GOMU KYOKAISHI, January 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 168)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
EVALUATION OF THERMAL DEGRADATION AND DYNAMIC FATIGUE OF RUBBER VULCANIZATES BY DYNAMIC VISCOELASTOMETRY
Published in
NIPPON GOMU KYOKAISHI, January 1996
DOI 10.2324/gomu.69.693
Authors

Satoshi ISHIMARU, Sumiko MATSUMURA, Mitsuo AKIBA

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2023.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from NIPPON GOMU KYOKAISHI
#15
of 168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,327
of 81,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NIPPON GOMU KYOKAISHI
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 168 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them