↓ Skip to main content

唐代封爵制拾遺

Overview of attention for article published in Shakai keizai shigaku, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 142)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
唐代封爵制拾遺
Published in
Shakai keizai shigaku, December 2017
DOI 10.20624/sehs.12.4_419
Authors

今堀 誠二

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2021.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Shakai keizai shigaku
#11
of 142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,316
of 452,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Shakai keizai shigaku
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.