↓ Skip to main content

木曾御岳火山 1979 年噴火後の活動状況と地球化学的研究

Overview of attention for article published in SECOND SERIES BULLETIN OF THE VOLCANOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, April 1983
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
木曾御岳火山 1979 年噴火後の活動状況と地球化学的研究
Published in
SECOND SERIES BULLETIN OF THE VOLCANOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, April 1983
DOI 10.18940/kazanc.28.1_59
Authors

小坂 丈予, 小沢 竹二郎, 酒井 均, 平林 順一

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from SECOND SERIES BULLETIN OF THE VOLCANOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN
#7
of 75 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,194
of 7,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SECOND SERIES BULLETIN OF THE VOLCANOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 75 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.