You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A fundamental investigation on the cultivation of Wasavia japonica (1).
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
THE JOURNAL OF THE JAPANESE FORESTRY SOCIETY, December 2008
|
| DOI | 10.11519/jjfs1953.38.10_415 |
| Authors |
Rokutaro TSUKIJI, Tadashi SUZUKI |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,529,883
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from THE JOURNAL OF THE JAPANESE FORESTRY SOCIETY
#4
of 104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,215
of 183,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from THE JOURNAL OF THE JAPANESE FORESTRY SOCIETY
#2
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.