↓ Skip to main content

鳥浜貝塚から出土したウルシ材の年代

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Historical Botany, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
鳥浜貝塚から出土したウルシ材の年代
Published in
Japanese Journal of Historical Botany, March 2021
DOI 10.34596/hisbot.21.2_67
Authors

鈴木 三男, 能城 修一, 小林 和貴, 工藤 雄一郎, 鯵本 眞友美, 網谷 克彦

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2021.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Historical Botany
#5
of 22 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,471
of 470,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Historical Botany
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one scored the same or higher as 17 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.