↓ Skip to main content

Seasonal Change of Vocalization of the Okinawa Rail (Gallirallus okinawae)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Yamashina Institute for Ornithology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Seasonal Change of Vocalization of the Okinawa Rail (Gallirallus okinawae)
Published in
Journal of the Yamashina Institute for Ornithology, January 2013
DOI 10.3312/jyio.45.1
Authors

Takuji Hirayama, Makoto Fukuda, Morihiko Hirakawa

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2016.
All research outputs
#8,119,076
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Yamashina Institute for Ornithology
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,849
of 289,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Yamashina Institute for Ornithology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.