You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Diet and prey availability of Siganus fuscescens occurring in a Sargassum bed at Futaoi Island in the Sea of Hibiki with respect to feeding on large brown macroalgae
|
---|---|
Published in |
NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI, January 2011
|
DOI | 10.2331/suisan.77.1008 |
Authors |
MIKIO NODA, HIROFUMI OHARA, KENJI URAKAWA, NOBORU MURASE, KEN-ICHI YAMAMOTO |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 33% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 33% |
Researcher | 1 | 17% |
Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 3 | 50% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI
#144
of 881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,799
of 190,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 881 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.