↓ Skip to main content

福島県猪苗代湖の湖底堆積物コア(INW2012)の岩相層序と年代

Overview of attention for article published in The Quaternary Research (Daiyonki-Kenkyu), October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 216)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
福島県猪苗代湖の湖底堆積物コア(INW2012)の岩相層序と年代
Published in
The Quaternary Research (Daiyonki-Kenkyu), October 2014
DOI 10.4116/jaqua.53.157
Authors

廣瀬 孝太郎, 長橋 良隆, 中澤 なおみ

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2017.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from The Quaternary Research (Daiyonki-Kenkyu)
#44
of 216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,239
of 275,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Quaternary Research (Daiyonki-Kenkyu)
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them