↓ Skip to main content

代数的K理論

Overview of attention for article published in SUGAKU, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 351)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
代数的K理論
Published in
SUGAKU, December 2008
DOI 10.11429/sugaku1947.34.97
Authors

加藤 和也

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,531,822
of 25,859,234 outputs
Outputs from SUGAKU
#41
of 351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,631
of 185,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SUGAKU
#32
of 260 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,859,234 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 351 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 260 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.