↓ Skip to main content

太平洋地質・地球物理アトラスを読む(2) : 収録されている図とデータ(続)(紹介)

Overview of attention for article published in Earth Science (Chikyu Kagaku), July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 135)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
太平洋地質・地球物理アトラスを読む(2) : 収録されている図とデータ(続)(紹介)
Published in
Earth Science (Chikyu Kagaku), July 2017
DOI 10.15080/agcjchikyukagaku.60.5_441
Authors

杉山 明

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2019.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Earth Science (Chikyu Kagaku)
#21
of 135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,729
of 325,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth Science (Chikyu Kagaku)
#7
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 135 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.