↓ Skip to main content

微生物によるビタミンと補酵素型ビタミンの生産

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of the Society of Chemical Industry, Japan, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 173)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
微生物によるビタミンと補酵素型ビタミンの生産
Published in
The Journal of the Society of Chemical Industry, Japan, September 2011
DOI 10.1246/nikkashi1898.67.5_668
Authors

福井 三郎, 清水 祥一, 加藤 忠克

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2019.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of the Society of Chemical Industry, Japan
#20
of 173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,790
of 136,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of the Society of Chemical Industry, Japan
#5
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 173 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.