↓ Skip to main content

岐阜県美濃テレーン上麻生ユニットの礫岩に含まれるチャート岩体から産出したペルム紀放散虫化石

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
岐阜県美濃テレーン上麻生ユニットの礫岩に含まれるチャート岩体から産出したペルム紀放散虫化石
Published in
Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, June 2016
DOI 10.5575/geosoc.2016.0013
Authors

伊藤 剛, 北川 祐介, 松岡 篤

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Geological Society of Japan
#85
of 595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,166
of 367,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Geological Society of Japan
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 595 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.