↓ Skip to main content

The List of Movable Bridges in Japan and the Conservation and Use of Bridges

Overview of attention for article published in HISTORICAL STUDIES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 134)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The List of Movable Bridges in Japan and the Conservation and Use of Bridges
Published in
HISTORICAL STUDIES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, January 2002
DOI 10.2208/journalhs1990.22.333
Authors

ITOH Takashi

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from HISTORICAL STUDIES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING
#15
of 134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,444
of 130,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HISTORICAL STUDIES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.