↓ Skip to main content

箱根火山大涌谷テフラ群 : 最新マグマ噴火後の水蒸気爆発堆積物

Overview of attention for article published in BULLETIN OF THE VOLCANOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
箱根火山大涌谷テフラ群 : 最新マグマ噴火後の水蒸気爆発堆積物
Published in
BULLETIN OF THE VOLCANOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, August 2006
DOI 10.18940/kazan.51.4_245
Authors

小林 淳, 萬年 一剛, 奥野 充, 中村 俊夫, 袴田 和夫

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2022.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from BULLETIN OF THE VOLCANOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN
#56
of 205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,680
of 90,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BULLETIN OF THE VOLCANOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 205 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.