↓ Skip to main content

クリプキの同一説批判

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophy (Tetsugaku), July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 174)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
クリプキの同一説批判
Published in
Philosophy (Tetsugaku), July 2009
DOI 10.11439/philosophy1952.1984.173
Authors

鈴木 登

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2021.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Philosophy (Tetsugaku)
#33
of 174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,629
of 123,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophy (Tetsugaku)
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 174 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.