You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Double Blind Test on Chlorhexidine Gluconate Containing Tooth Paste (LS-5) on Periodontal Disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai kaishi, January 1983
|
| DOI | 10.2329/perio.25.955 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Takayuki SHIOIRI, Shigetaka AKISHIGE, Ichiro ISHIKAWA, Eisuke MIYAKAWA, Miyoko FUKUI, Yasushi ARISAWA, Michio TAKASHIMA |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 29% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 14% |
| Researcher | 1 | 14% |
| Other | 1 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 71% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2011.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai kaishi
#21
of 139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,006
of 33,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai kaishi
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 139 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them