You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
アジア産蘚苔類の分類・生態ノ-ト28. : 国内・国外でQueen Mossあるいはマナウス産ウィローモスとして流通している蘚類はHydropogonella gymnostomaである
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bryological Research, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.24474/bryologicalresearch.10.11_367 |
| Authors |
秋山 弘之 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2023.
All research outputs
#8,145,365
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Bryological Research
#4
of 26 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,580
of 342,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bryological Research
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one scored the same or higher as 22 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.