↓ Skip to main content

耕地土壌の脱窒過程

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
耕地土壌の脱窒過程
Published in
Japanese Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, June 2017
DOI 10.20710/dojo.65.4_463
Authors

西尾 隆

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2017.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition
#12
of 94 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,111
of 329,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.