↓ Skip to main content

Utilization of Nonwood Plant Fibers for Pulping-The Status Quo and Future

Overview of attention for article published in JAPAN TAPPI JOURNAL, January 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 105)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Utilization of Nonwood Plant Fibers for Pulping-The Status Quo and Future
Published in
JAPAN TAPPI JOURNAL, January 1997
DOI 10.2524/jtappij.51.895
Authors

Masakaza Monsanto

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from JAPAN TAPPI JOURNAL
#10
of 105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,961
of 92,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAPAN TAPPI JOURNAL
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them