↓ Skip to main content

66. MR-Angio におけるフェーズコントラスト法とタイムオブフライト法の比較検討 (第 2 報)(MRI-1 (VTR セッション), 中国・四国部会)

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi, January 1992
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 217)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
66. MR-Angio におけるフェーズコントラスト法とタイムオブフライト法の比較検討 (第 2 報)(MRI-1 (VTR セッション), 中国・四国部会)
Published in
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi, January 1992
DOI 10.6009/jjrt.kj00003576841
Authors

高羽 順子, 升屋 亮三, 池田 俊貴, 中垣 五月, 斉藤 温己

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,811,784
of 26,047,917 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi
#25
of 217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,297
of 61,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,047,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them