↓ Skip to main content

日本軍票の貨幣史的考察(二)

Overview of attention for article published in Asian Studies, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 119)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
日本軍票の貨幣史的考察(二)
Published in
Asian Studies, September 2014
DOI 10.11479/asianstudies.27.2_43
Authors

岩武 照彦

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2019.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Asian Studies
#23
of 119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,139
of 248,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asian Studies
#7
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.