You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of Eluates of Denture Adhesives on Human Gingival Fibroblasts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Prosthodontic Research, January 2001
|
| DOI | 10.2186/jjps.45.403 |
| Authors |
Seicho Makihira, Hiroki Nikawa, Haruki Nishimura, Masahiro Nishimura, Hiroshi Murata, Shinsuke Sadamori, Kazuhiro Ishida, Hirofumi Yamashiro, Chen Jin, Hiroshi Egusa, Hitoshi Fukushima, Taizo Hamada |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2011.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Prosthodontic Research
#39
of 288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,248
of 114,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Prosthodontic Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 288 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them