↓ Skip to main content

An Attempt to Depress Jaundice of Yellowtail Infected with Causative Bacteria by Feeding High Ascorbic Acid Diet

Overview of attention for article published in NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An Attempt to Depress Jaundice of Yellowtail Infected with Causative Bacteria by Feeding High Ascorbic Acid Diet
Published in
NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI, January 2000
DOI 10.2331/suisan.66.298
Authors

Takafumi Ito, Hisashi Murata, Tsuyoshi Oyama, Terutoyo Yoshida, Tadashi Sakai, Kiyoshi Yamauchi, Tokio Yamaguchi, Masaharu Ukawa

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI
#144
of 881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,912
of 109,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 881 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.