↓ Skip to main content

TAXONOMIC STUDY ON THE GENUS PICHIA HANSEN (2)

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology, January 1962
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
TAXONOMIC STUDY ON THE GENUS PICHIA HANSEN (2)
Published in
The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology, January 1962
DOI 10.2323/jgam.8.52
Authors

KENKICHI KODAMA, TADASHI KYONO, SHOJIRO KODAMA

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology
#97
of 545 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#635
of 8,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 545 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them