↓ Skip to main content

最近5年間のLAMP法を用いた小児肺炎のMycoplasma pneumoniae DNA検出成績

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Medical Technology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 121)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
最近5年間のLAMP法を用いた小児肺炎のMycoplasma pneumoniae DNA検出成績
Published in
Japanese Journal of Medical Technology, November 2015
DOI 10.14932/jamt.15-4
Authors

岩田 泰, 中根 一匡, 河内 誠, 野田 由美子, 舟橋 恵二, 後藤 研誠, 西村 直子, 尾崎 隆男

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2016.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Medical Technology
#35
of 121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,067
of 295,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Medical Technology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 121 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.