↓ Skip to main content

Effective Preoperative Examinations and Postoperative Rounds

Overview of attention for article published in THE JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY FOR CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 174)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effective Preoperative Examinations and Postoperative Rounds
Published in
THE JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY FOR CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, January 2009
DOI 10.2199/jjsca.29.427
Authors

Akitomo YONEI

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,606,277
of 25,551,063 outputs
Outputs from THE JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY FOR CLINICAL ANESTHESIA
#24
of 174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,008
of 183,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from THE JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY FOR CLINICAL ANESTHESIA
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,551,063 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 174 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.